Academic
and Research Libraries Division (ARLD)
Meeting
of
Present:
Julie Kelly (chair), Karen Docherty,
Julie
called the meeting to order at
There were no additions to the agenda.
Minutes of the May meeting were approved.
Old Business:
1) MLA Programs for the Annual Conference- any updates?
There
are nine sessions at
Julie Kelly. will attempt to get an updated ACRL Minnesota membership to use for better distribution of our email announcements.
Karen D. will send a note to ARLD presenters soliciting (optional) pre-conference postings for our web pages. These may include questions for attendees, key presentation points, bibliographies, etc.
2)
Academic Librarians Day, 2004
Nothing new to report. Business on this item is now complete.
3) @Your Library (local workshops)
Anne
Mackereth has agreed to coordinate @Your Library workshops for the
4)
Instruction Dialogues
Scott Marsalis reported that he is planning to organize some of these in Autumn 2004 (perhaps one out-state and one in the Twin Cities). The Board was open to having additional interest areas besides instruction covered in future dialogues, thus benefiting more of the academic library community.
5) ARLD Web Page- pagemaking
Linda Eells reported that there has been a compatibility problem between her software, Dreamweaver, and the MLA website, which is edited using Front Page. The problem has been solved by Linda gaining access to Front Page for editing. She was thanked for her work on the page.
6) MLA
Legislative Forum
Robin Ewing reported on her attendance at the MLA Legislative Forum. She described the content of the day, MLA’s platform building efforts, and the latest interactions between the State, the legislature, and libraries. Several actions were suggested as a result of Robin’s report:
the creation of a legislative page in the MLA ARLD web area. This could include resources, links to other sites like MnSCU, etc., as well as other useful legislative information. Linda E. and Robin E. will discuss how to make this happen and report back to the Board at a later date.
The new
“state librarian,” Suzanne Miller will be asked to speak at the ARLD
business meeting in
7)
An ARLD Brochure for the Annual Conference?
An
email memo from
a) to not list board members’ names on the brochure as they change too often
b) Julie K. will investigate with Alison Johnson whether ARLD has a vision or mission statement on record to put in the brochure. No board members were aware of anything related to mission or vision statements. If they do not exist, James Caufield and Victoria Peters will be asked to coordinate the creation of them.
c) Long range goals might be part of a later brochure, but not this first one.
d) ARLD is not planning to change its name or acronym
e) The brochure could be distributed at the conference with an insert describing our programs.
f) There was discussion that brochures could be created for the conference, as well as put on our web site, and then discussed by membership at the business meeting, with the hope that member input could be used in creating the 2nd edition.
As our meeting time had become tight, and two of the key brochure creators were not able to attend, it was decided to continue discussion of the brochure at our August Board meeting, with Kelly informing Hulseberg and Clarke of what we had decided.
New Business:
1) Call for ACRL Conference Volunteers- coming soon
Julie K. will ask Anna H. to send out a note to our distribution list, asking interested people to go to the ACRL Conference website if they wish to volunteer at the conference next April. There will be all sorts of volunteer options, from stuffing conference bags, to hosting “Birds of a Feather” dinners.
2)
Collegial Groups/interest groups/learning
communities- should we sponsor?
Julie asked the Board if ARLD should sponsor either local learning communities, or statewide interest groups, or combinations of the two, in order to expand the continuing education opportunities ARLD provides its members. Discussion ensued. Everyone who spoke was enthusiastic about the long-term prospects of ARLD facilitating opportunities like this. Potential interest groups focusing on technology and collection development were mentioned, among others. Regional groups were also spoken of with enthusiasm. However, action was tabled, and there was general consensus that too many things are going on with ARLD and ACRL this academic year to allow us to actively pursue these ideas before next summer. Julie was encouraged to explore what other states’ ACRL chapters do in this area.
During
the course of discussion, MLA’s development of leadership academies arose.
The board asked Jim Newsome to look into what is being planned, and
whether this is something that ARLD could be part of.
He will contact Carol Johnson of the
Julie Kelly will set up our next meeting for late in August.
Respectfully submitted,
Jim Newsome, recorder